<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UKRIO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukrio.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukrio.org</link>
	<description>Expert advice and guidance about the conduct of research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UKRIO welcomes widespread support for its work in ‘A Consensus Statement on Research Misconduct in the UK’</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/ukrio-welcomes-widespread-support-for-its-work-in-%e2%80%98a-consensus-statement-on-research-misconduct-in-the-uk%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/ukrio-welcomes-widespread-support-for-its-work-in-%e2%80%98a-consensus-statement-on-research-misconduct-in-the-uk%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK Research Integrity Office welcomes the publication today of ‘A Consensus Statement on Research Misconduct in the UK’. UKRIO agrees that the UK&#8217;s mechanisms for ensuring good research practice need to be sustained and strengthened. We particularly welcome the Statement’s support for UKRIO and the recognition that our work deserves wider support from the... <a href="http://www.ukrio.org/ukrio-welcomes-widespread-support-for-its-work-in-%e2%80%98a-consensus-statement-on-research-misconduct-in-the-uk%e2%80%99/" class="readmore">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/ukrio-welcomes-widespread-support-for-its-work-in-%e2%80%98a-consensus-statement-on-research-misconduct-in-the-uk%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Researchers feel pressure to cite superfluous papers&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/researchers-feel-pressure-to-cite-superfluous-papers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/researchers-feel-pressure-to-cite-superfluous-papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=1044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nature reports on a survey, published in Science, on coercive citation in academic publishing: &#8216;One in five academics in a variety of social science and business fields say they have been asked to pad their papers with superfluous references in order to get published. The figures, from a survey published today in Science, also suggest... <a href="http://www.ukrio.org/researchers-feel-pressure-to-cite-superfluous-papers/" class="readmore">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/researchers-feel-pressure-to-cite-superfluous-papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation on new MRC good research practice guidance</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/consultation-on-new-mrc-good-research-practice-guidance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/consultation-on-new-mrc-good-research-practice-guidance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Medical Research Council is currently revising its principles and guidelines on good research practice and is seeking views on the draft document, available here. The MRC would particularly welcome views on whether the new principles and guidelines provide the right level of information and are clear and comprehensive, as well as views on any... <a href="http://www.ukrio.org/consultation-on-new-mrc-good-research-practice-guidance/" class="readmore">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/consultation-on-new-mrc-good-research-practice-guidance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on our move to a wider pool of funders and supporters</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/update-on-our-move-to-a-wider-pool-of-funders-and-supporters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/update-on-our-move-to-a-wider-pool-of-funders-and-supporters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UKRIO continues to receive a positive response to its new model of funding. More than half of the Russell Group of UK universities has now agreed to support UKRIO. Universities supporting UKRIO include Bristol, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow, King’s College London, Liverpool,  Manchester, Nottingham, Oxford, Sheffield, University College London and Warwick, as well as other research-intensive universities and those... <a href="http://www.ukrio.org/update-on-our-move-to-a-wider-pool-of-funders-and-supporters/" class="readmore">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/update-on-our-move-to-a-wider-pool-of-funders-and-supporters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>General Medical Council: new guidance on raising concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/general-medical-council-new-guidance-on-raising-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/general-medical-council-new-guidance-on-raising-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=1031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The General Medical Council has issued new guidance for doctors on raising and acting on concerns about patient safety. The new guidance comes into effect on 12 March 2012. From the GMC website: &#8216;The guidance explains when doctors need to raise concerns and advises on the help and support available to them, including how to... <a href="http://www.ukrio.org/general-medical-council-new-guidance-on-raising-concerns/" class="readmore">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/general-medical-council-new-guidance-on-raising-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Times Higher: Make it easier to whistleblow while you work</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/times-higher-make-it-easier-to-whistleblow-while-you-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/times-higher-make-it-easier-to-whistleblow-while-you-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Times Higher reports on the recent BMJ-COPE conference on scientific misconduct. Times Higher: Make it easier to whistleblow while you work]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/times-higher-make-it-easier-to-whistleblow-while-you-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nature: Face up to fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/nature-face-up-to-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/nature-face-up-to-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Nature: &#8216;The UK government and funding agencies must address research misconduct.&#8217; Nature: Face up to fraud]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/nature-face-up-to-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Widespread support for the work of UKRIO at &#8216;Research misconduct in the UK: time to act’</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/research-misconduct-in-the-uk-time-to-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/research-misconduct-in-the-uk-time-to-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12th January, UKRIO participated in a meeting of leading members of the country’s scientific establishment, organised by the British Medical Journal and the Committee on Publication Ethics. Speakers described how the UK and other countries have approached challenges to research integrity, the issues and problems associated with current systems in the UK and abroad,... <a href="http://www.ukrio.org/research-misconduct-in-the-uk-time-to-act/" class="readmore">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/research-misconduct-in-the-uk-time-to-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Wager: Do we need to rethink our approaches to research misconduct and research integrity?</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/liz-wager-do-we-need-to-rethink-our-approaches-to-research-misconduct-and-research-integrity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/liz-wager-do-we-need-to-rethink-our-approaches-to-research-misconduct-and-research-integrity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From BMJ Group Blogs. Liz Wager of UKRIO and the Committee on Publication Ethics discusses whether approaches to addressing research misconduct should be based on major scandals or the more common questionable behaviours &#8211; behaviours which can be just as harmful, if not more so. She also examines the need for institutions to promote good... <a href="http://www.ukrio.org/liz-wager-do-we-need-to-rethink-our-approaches-to-research-misconduct-and-research-integrity/" class="readmore">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/liz-wager-do-we-need-to-rethink-our-approaches-to-research-misconduct-and-research-integrity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science: UK Looks for Way Through Misconduct Maze</title>
		<link>http://www.ukrio.org/science-uk-looks-for-way-through-misconduct-maze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ukrio.org/science-uk-looks-for-way-through-misconduct-maze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Parry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukrio.org/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the recent BMJ-and COPE-sponsored meeting on research misconduct, Sara Reardon of Science examines the current situation in the UK and other countries, and the various mechanisms adopted to deal with them. Science: UK Looks for Way Through Misconduct Maze]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ukrio.org/science-uk-looks-for-way-through-misconduct-maze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

